FRAUD: ATIKU’S SERVER THAT FAILED TO PRODUCE RESULTS FOR 71 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ACROSS 119,973 POLLING UNITS
Atiku Abubakar
BY INWALOMHE DONALD
I am appealing to Atiku server to produce the result of other 71 presidential candidates because one of them could be the winner of the presidential and not Atiku Abubakar as claimed by his server. I am confused about the server that produced only Atiku as the winner. I could not understand why Atiku Server failed to produce election results of more than 71 presidential candidates of the February election in Nigeria. Atiku’s result submitted at the tribunal was silent on the votes scored by the other 71 presidential candidates held in 119,973 polling units, collated in 8,809 wards across Nigeria, whereas INEC recorded 869, 758 votes for the candidates. Even though INEC released a list of 73 parties that contested the election, it failed to list any candidate for the Social Democratic Party (SDP) because two candidates were in court battling over the ticket. Atiku server was only designed for Buhari and Atiku results. INEC SERVER is not simply a social media blitz and result of 2019 presidential election was declared by INEC in line with Independent National Electoral Commission Regulations and Guidelines for the Conduct of Elections, 2019 in pursuant of the powers conferred on the commission by the Electoral Act 2010, as amended.
Atiku Server faces momentous elections FRAUD in which the registered 84 million voters were set to elect a president for another four years. Atiku Server could not produce election results for 109 Senatorial districts and 360 House of Representatives constituencies. The number of presidential candidates seems to have set a record. “Can Atiku explain why his server could not provide results for all presidential candidates in the election?” Why his server did only captured the results of APC and PDP?
With results from all states during the elections, Buhari won with more than three million votes over his rival Atiku Abubakar. Mr Abubakar’s People’s Democratic Party (PDP) called for a halt in the count, alleging irregularities. PDP chairman Uche Secondus called the count “incorrect and unacceptable”. The party said counting should be stopped, alleging data from voter card readers had been manipulated. Each party said the other was working with the Independent National Electoral Commission (Inec) to influence the vote, which was initially scheduled for 16 February but delayed for a week at the last minute. Delays and violence marred the run-up to the vote but no independent observer has said that there was electoral fraud.
Mr Buhari, a member of the governing All Progressives Congress (APC) party, is seeking a second term in office. So far the APC has 19 states, while the PDP has 16 plus the capital Abuja. The candidate with the most votes is declared the winner as long as they have at least 25% of the votes in 24 or more of the 36 states.
Atiku had in the petition claimed that results from INEC server showed that he won the election with a total of 18, 356, 732 as against the 16,741,430 votes scored by President Muhammadu Buhari. He, however, said that the numbers were without the results from Rivers State, which he claimed were not uploaded on the server.
But INEC had during its final announcement of results for the election on February 27 returned President Muhammadu Buhari as winner with 15, 191, 847 votes.
It said Atiku scored 11, 262, 978 votes. The electoral umpire included collated result from Rivers State where out of 678,167 total votes cast, Atiku polled 473,871 while Buhari got 150, 710.
The result from Rivers State takes the total votes gotten by Atiku on the server to 18, 830,603, while also increasing Buhari’s votes to 16,892,140 votes.
However, the figures, which recorded a total of 35, 722, 743 valid votes did not tally with INEC’s declared valid votes of 27, 324, 583.
The results, which showed 43 per cent voter turnout out of the 82 million collated registered voters, also disagreed with the 36 per cent voter turnout declared by INEC.
The votes poll
BY INWALOMHE DONALD
I am appealing to Atiku server to produce the result of other 71 presidential candidates because one of them could be the winner of the presidential and not Atiku Abubakar as claimed by his server. I am confused about the server that produced only Atiku as the winner. I could not understand why Atiku Server failed to produce election results of more than 71 presidential candidates of the February election in Nigeria. Atiku’s result submitted at the tribunal was silent on the votes scored by the other 71 presidential candidates held in 119,973 polling units, collated in 8,809 wards across Nigeria, whereas INEC recorded 869, 758 votes for the candidates. Even though INEC released a list of 73 parties that contested the election, it failed to list any candidate for the Social Democratic Party (SDP) because two candidates were in court battling over the ticket. Atiku server was only designed for Buhari and Atiku results. INEC SERVER is not simply a social media blitz and result of 2019 presidential election was declared by INEC in line with Independent National Electoral Commission Regulations and Guidelines for the Conduct of Elections, 2019 in pursuant of the powers conferred on the commission by the Electoral Act 2010, as amended.
Atiku Server faces momentous elections FRAUD in which the registered 84 million voters were set to elect a president for another four years. Atiku Server could not produce election results for 109 Senatorial districts and 360 House of Representatives constituencies. The number of presidential candidates seems to have set a record. “Can Atiku explain why his server could not provide results for all presidential candidates in the election?” Why his server did only captured the results of APC and PDP?
With results from all states during the elections, Buhari won with more than three million votes over his rival Atiku Abubakar. Mr Abubakar’s People’s Democratic Party (PDP) called for a halt in the count, alleging irregularities. PDP chairman Uche Secondus called the count “incorrect and unacceptable”. The party said counting should be stopped, alleging data from voter card readers had been manipulated. Each party said the other was working with the Independent National Electoral Commission (Inec) to influence the vote, which was initially scheduled for 16 February but delayed for a week at the last minute. Delays and violence marred the run-up to the vote but no independent observer has said that there was electoral fraud.
Mr Buhari, a member of the governing All Progressives Congress (APC) party, is seeking a second term in office. So far the APC has 19 states, while the PDP has 16 plus the capital Abuja. The candidate with the most votes is declared the winner as long as they have at least 25% of the votes in 24 or more of the 36 states.
Atiku had in the petition claimed that results from INEC server showed that he won the election with a total of 18, 356, 732 as against the 16,741,430 votes scored by President Muhammadu Buhari. He, however, said that the numbers were without the results from Rivers State, which he claimed were not uploaded on the server.
But INEC had during its final announcement of results for the election on February 27 returned President Muhammadu Buhari as winner with 15, 191, 847 votes.
It said Atiku scored 11, 262, 978 votes. The electoral umpire included collated result from Rivers State where out of 678,167 total votes cast, Atiku polled 473,871 while Buhari got 150, 710.
The result from Rivers State takes the total votes gotten by Atiku on the server to 18, 830,603, while also increasing Buhari’s votes to 16,892,140 votes.
However, the figures, which recorded a total of 35, 722, 743 valid votes did not tally with INEC’s declared valid votes of 27, 324, 583.
The results, which showed 43 per cent voter turnout out of the 82 million collated registered voters, also disagreed with the 36 per cent voter turnout declared by INEC.
The votes poll
Comments
Post a Comment